Friday, January 30, 2026

ATF Registers a Potato as a Suppressor | VIDEO

National Association for Gun Rights staff member Zackary Clark successfully registered a potato with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives during 2026 under the new rules, as a silencer.  The new rules, starting on January 1, do not require the payment of a tax to make and register a silencer. Silencers are classified as “firearms” in the National Firearms Act (NFA). The video recorded by Zackary shows what happened to the potato when it was used as a silencer.  A fair amount of energy goes into blowing a potato into small pieces. Almost certainly, the noise from the shot, fired through the potato, was reduced by some amount. This makes the potato a silencer under the law’s definition. Zackary Clark has the receipts. From gunrights.org:

National Association for Gun Rights’ own Digital Content Creator, Zackary Clark, became the first person to legally register a potato as a firearm suppressor with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

The ATF Form 1, shown below in part, clearly identifies the potato as the registered silencer. Silencer designs are not required to be effective. A one-shot silencer is not unreasonable when there is no tax. A zero tax is no tax.

Serial number: TATE001
Serial number: TATE001

The nomenclature required to be on the silencer appears to have been engraved on the rear attachment, or cap, which is a reasonable place to put it. Areas on the back of the end cap have been blacked out to preserve privacy.  Zachary is effectively using absurdity, hilarious absurdity, to show the idiocy of the NFA’s ridiculous bureaucratic requirements to allow people to access a useful safety device.

Zachary’s political range-theater does a good job. It was masterfully done. It illustrates more than the absurdity of a one-shot potato silencer. It shows the ease with which ordinary people can fill out a Form 1 and make their own silencers for very little money. By the end of January 2026, over 300,000 applications have been filed with the ATF to purchase, transfer, or make items requiring a zero-tax tax-stamp (what an absurdity!) for short barreled rifles (sbr), short barreled shotguns (sbs), silencers, and any other weapons (aow). Most of those are probably for the transfer of commercially made silencers on a form 4. A good chunk are for the manufacture of short barreled rifles or short barreled shotguns on a Form 1. A significant number will be for the manufacture of silencers on a Form 1.

Fairly effective silencers for subsonic and even cartridges up to the 5.56×45 or .223 Remington are not difficult to make from common materials if the barrel of the firearm is threaded. The correct alignment of the threaded barrel is the most difficult part of the operation.

A silencer can become fairly effective through volume control. Large volume suppressors reduce the pressure of the expanding gases, so lower-strength materials become effective. Internal baffles and sound-absorbing materials make a silencer more effective at all sizes.

At the SHOT show, this correspondent expressed interest in making a simple suppressor after legally obtaining a Form 1. When a person at the ATF booth was engaged in casual conversation about it, they were neither dismayed, surprised, nor concerned. Effective suppressors can be easily printed on 3D printers from common materials. The designs are available online. It is likely that a plastic, 3D printed suppressor for .22 cartridges will last several hundred rounds without significant degradation.

A 3D printer is not necessary. With an inexpensive thread adapter from 1/2×28 or 5/8×24 to 3/4 NPT,  a large volume, effective suppressor can be assembled from common PVC pipe and parts. Make sure your thread adapter matches the thread on the firearm you wish to suppress.  The serial number should be placed on the metal part, the thread adapter. PVC caps threaded in 3/4 NPT are readily available.

Homemade silencers that are made from readily available materials may not be as pretty, light, small, or well-designed as commercial silencers made from titanium, Inconel, or even steel and aluminum. They can be effective, especially with subsonic cartridges. They can substantially reduce the blast from more intense cartridges if the volume is large enough.

This correspondent has been told the 5.56×45 cartridge can be effectively suppressed with a PVC suppressor of 4 inches in diameter, about 16 inches long. It won’t be whisper quiet, but hearing damage potential is greatly reduced, as is flash and recoil. Subsonic .22 rimfire suppressors can be effectively suppressed with a volumetric suppressor an inch in diameter and 5 inches long, for a long barreled rifle. An endcap at the front of the silencer, with a cone pointed toward the back, is very helpful.  The more volume the less of sophisticated design is required. .22 pistols require large/more sophisticated suppressors because of higher pressures and more gas at the muzzle of the pistol. Many designs can be found with a little searching on the Internet.  Centerfire pistols which move the barrel to unlock the action require a more sophisticated suppressor to operate the action reliably.

The removal of silencers from the NFA is on the horizon. The more politicians and public become informed of the absurdities of the NFA, the more likely silencer and short barreled rifles are to be removed, along with any other weapons (aow) from the NFA.

Short barreled shotguns may take a bit more because they have been hyped so much. It seems likely the 1986 ban on the manufacture of machine guns available to the public will be struck down, but the timing is unclear.  Machine guns and destructive devices will be the last to be taken off the NFA. Do not spoil the removal of silencers, sbrs, sbs, and aow by insisting on the inclusion of machine guns and destructive devices. Incrementalism works.

The more people who pay zero tax and who buy or make silencers, the more likely they will be removed from the NFA, either by legislation or by court action.

This correspondent expects to help swell the numbers. Silencers are very useful safety devices.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten




from https://ift.tt/wjERt1h
via IFTTT

Gun Grabber Propaganda Makes Americans Less Safe (Again)

Public Opinion Protest America pro gun iStock-Jon Rehg 1263488087
Public Opinion Protest America pro gun iStock-Jon Rehg 1263488087

“Anyone who values freedom should be sickened to see a U.S. citizen summarily shot by her own government on the streets of an American city,” said Kris Brown, president of the Brady Bunch. “And, in a country governed by the rule of law as the United States claims to be, citizens and noncitizens alike have the right to due process and freedom from wanton, arbitrary, and lethal violence. We can and must do more to end police and law enforcement violence that too often leads to tragedies like today and provide accountability when agents act unlawfully.”

Brown’s statement came just hours after the January 7 incident, when the investigation had barely begun. This is SOP for gun control: In the world of 21st-century sound-bite journalism, ‘fast’ beats ‘facts’ every time.

Grady Judd, the outspoken sheriff of Polk County, Florida, provided a somewhat less ‘nuanced’ but far more honest assessment of the incident in the context of a legitimate use of deadly force. Given Judd’s 53 years of law enforcement experience, including his more than two decades as the longest-serving sheriff in Polk County history, I’d be inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

It’s worth noting that Sheriff Judd’s comments were made two days after the first shooting.

On January 24, ICE agents were involved in a confrontation with a legally armed protester. A skirmish ensued, and it appears two agents fired their weapons, killing the protester.

It’s been three weeks since the first incident; and days since the second. It’s too short a time for resolution. This is especially true for high-profile, politically charged, officer-involved shootings.

However, it’s a perfect time to examine ‘police violence’, another gun-grabber construct to crank up hype and hysteria — and generate views. Social media’s kangaroo court is in session.

According to the Brady Bunch, Dante Barry, a New Jersey-based organizer/social-justice warrior, introduced the term ‘police violence’ in response to the deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd in 2020. The Brady Bunch and their fellow travelers added police violence to their bags of bogus bogeymen in 2021.

What is ‘police violence’? Stripped down to its basics, gun control fans are playing the race card. They’re adding it to a hand of well-worn cards they’ve played again and again, such as demanding gun owners take responsibility for mass shootings simply because they own firearms. It’s all part of the gun-grabbers’ time-tested strategy of imbuing firearms with mythical powers capable of seducing compliant sheeple and transforming them into dangerous gun owners.

In the case of law, police officers, who generally support citizens’ gun rights, the real target audience is easily influenced mayors and city council members. Police chiefs are hired by those same mayors and city council members and are well aware that defiance seldom has a happy ending.

According to the Brady Bunch’s web page, “The senseless and brutal murders of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd brought millions of Americans of all backgrounds and races to the streets demanding justice and reigniting the national debate on policing, public safety, and racial justice.”

[Considering the $2 billion in economic damages and the 93% jump in the number of homicides in the second half of 2020 compared to the first six months, it’s obvious that at least some of those millions of Americans were engaged in other activities.]

Looking over their wish list, virtually unchanged since 2021, it is clear the Brady Bunch knows absolutely nothing about the realities of law enforcement. According to an article posted in January 2021 by Dr. John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center, the other leading gun control addicts are equally clueless.

‘Clueless’ has consequences. Seattle, Washington, is a good example.

Seattle’s Democrat-Left municipal government embraced the “police violence” meme with predictable results. Since 2020, resignations and retirements have left the Seattle Police Department with a critical shortage of officers. The loss of so many experienced officers also means the city will spend years regaining the competence and service levels residents could expect before the city government capitulated to the mob.

The equally blue cities of Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, Portland, and San Francisco followed similar paths in 2020 and 2021. All of them saw similar results.*

There’s a dirty little secret about “Police Violence,” and it highlights the gun-grabbers’ stupidity: Fewer officers on the streets means fewer officers to respond to calls, resulting in longer response times even for priority calls in life-threatening emergencies. Society is less safe.

On the other hand, it might inspire more Americans to become first-time gun owners.

*In April 2023, the Police Executive Research Forum published a summary of turnover, recruitment, and officer shortages in U.S. law enforcement agencies. It’s worth a look.

All data sourced from FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics reports.

Trump’s Second Amendment support questioned after Minneapolis shooting

DOJ Filing on Forced Reset Triggers Contradicts Pledges and Complicates Midterms


About Bill Cawthon

Bill Cawthon first became a gun owner 55 years ago. He has been an active advocate for Americans’ civil liberties for more than a decade. He is the information director for the Second Amendment Society of Texas.Bill Cawthon




from https://ift.tt/konUW4Q
via IFTTT

Thursday, January 29, 2026

SAF Files Amicus in Case Challenging Firearm Ban by Marijuana Users

NICS Background Check Marijuana Exclusion ATF Form 4473 Firearms Transaction Record Question. iStock-919659526
NICS Background Check Marijuana Exclusion ATF Form 4473 Firearms Transaction Record Question. iStock-919659526

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the respondent in United States v. Hemani, a case challenging the federal lifetime ban on firearm possession for marijuana users.

SAF is joined in the amicus filing by the California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.

“The government’s position defies Bruen and Rahimi by seeking to impose a permanent disarmament on law-abiding citizens who use marijuana, even when sober, without any distinctly similar historical tradition to justify such a draconian restriction,” said SAF Director of Legal Research and Education Kostas Moros. “History shows that Founding-era laws addressed the dangers of intoxication and firearms through temporary restrictions on those actively impaired, never by stripping gun rights from sober individuals who occasionally use socially accepted substances like alcohol — or, by analogy, marijuana today. We urge the Court to affirm the Fifth Circuit and reject this unconstitutional overreach.”

The ban on firearm possession by marijuana users affects millions of law-abiding Americans who face losing their Second Amendment rights simply for using a substance that is state-legal and widely accepted, often for medical reasons. Marijuana is currently legal to a various extent in 40 states.

“This case highlights the federal government’s unconstitutional infringement on the right to keep and bear arms for those legally using marijuana, ignoring clear historical limits,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “SAF is committed to defending these rights against outdated prohibitions, and we believe this warrants the Supreme Court’s affirmation.”

For more information visit SAF.org.


About the Second Amendment Foundation

The Second Amendment Foundation (saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group dedicated to safeguarding and promoting the fundamental rights of individuals enshrined in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. SAF engages in aggressive legal action to ensure the principles of armed self-defense, personal liberty, and the ownership of arms are defended, secured, and restored. Through public education initiatives, SAF teaches the importance of the Second Amendment to promote a society that values and exercises the right to keep and bear arms.Second Amendment Foundation SAF Logo



from https://ift.tt/mh1LjgP
via IFTTT

Multiple Gun Control Bills Advance in Virginia

Why Second Amendment Sanctuaries Are Important In Virginia & the U.S., Allexxandar-iStock-884220580
The NRA reports that Virginia has started advancing a slate of anti-gun bills. iStock-884220580

On Monday, January 26th, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee advanced a slate of gun control bills targeting semi-automatic firearms, standard capacity magazines, carry rights, home storage, and more. Most concerning, a substitute to SB 749 was adopted, the bill now bans all magazines above 10 rounds that are currently owned by law abiding Virginians. This will instantly turn individuals into criminals for owning most common handguns, semi-auto rifles and shotguns. Moreover, this hearing went forward while much of Virginia was under a winter storm state of emergency, making it difficult or impossible for many gun owners to safely travel to the Capitol to testify in person. Most of these bills now move to the Senate Finance Committee.

The following bills were reported from Senate Courts of Justice:

  • Senate Bill 749 bans certain semi-automatic firearms, including many semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns, and arbitrarily limits magazine capacities. With the removal of the grandfather clause for magazines, anyone in possession of magazines that exceed the arbitrary limit will become a criminal overnight. This bill is an attempt to redefine and ban firearms that are in common use by law-abiding citizens—plain and simple gun confiscation by definition.
  • Senate Bill 272 limits who can carry firearms at public institutions of higher learning.
  • Senate Bill 348 creates mandatory storage requirements for homes where minors and/or prohibited persons also reside.
  • Senate Bill 312 prohibits carrying “assault firearms” in public places, including streets, sidewalks, and parks. Because of vague definitions, SB 312 effectively criminalizes carrying any center-fire semi-automatic firearm in the Commonwealth.
  • Senate Bill 323 ends the centuries-old practice of individuals building lawful firearms for personal use without government interference by prohibiting the manufacture of firearms without serial numbers. Transfer and possession of an unserialized or plastic firearm would be prohibited. This legislation would also penalize individuals who lawfully purchased unfinished frames and receivers before the bill’s effective date.
  • Senate Bill 496 places further restrictions on the ability for a law-abiding individual to keep a firearm in their vehicle for self-defense.
  • Senate Bill 115 jeopardizes concealed handgun recognition and reciprocity agreements. This could impact the ability of Virginia’s Concealed Handgun Permit holders to carry their firearms in other states as they travel.

Meanwhile, the committee rejected Senate Bill 78, a measure that would have increased mandatory minimum sentences for repeat firearm offenses, sending a clear message that their priority is restricting lawful gun owners instead of violent offenders.

Please stay tuned to the NRA-ILA website and your inbox for updates as this legislative session progresses.


About NRA-ILA:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)



from https://ift.tt/aF6LISb
via IFTTT

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Tectonic Shift: Suddenly Left Supports 2A After Controversial Fatal Shooting

Suddenly the political left is supporting Second Amendment rights, now that a legally-armed anti-ICE protester has died in a physical confrontation with Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis.
Suddenly, the political left is supporting Second Amendment rights, now that a legally-armed anti-ICE protester has died in a physical confrontation with Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis.

In what can only be defined as a bizarre shift in attitude about guns, the Second Amendment and lawful concealed carry, the political left is taking a dramatically different look at the right to keep and bear arms, ignited by the deadly shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis and something the late Charlie Kirk wrote nearly eight years ago.

An editorialist might say the earth has shifted on its axis.

Newsweek is reporting that Kirk’s March 4, 2018 post on X—which read, “The 2nd amendment is not for hunting, it is not for self-protection. It is there to ensure that free people can defend themselves if god forbid government became tyrannical and turned against its citizens.”—suddenly makes sense to anti-ICE/anti-Trump administration protesters, courtesy of a group calling itself “Homeland Dems.”

Writing at Newsweek, Senior Life and Trends Reporter Alice Gibbs explains, “The renewed attention to Kirk’s statement comes as the Pretti case has become a flashpoint in the national gun debate, particularly around claims that firearms are necessary to resist government overreach.”

Adding to the furor, the New York Times has posted an analysis of the Pretti shooting, dissecting various videos from different angles, which appears to reach the same conclusions as one produced by Braden Langley of Langley Outdoors Academy, and reported by Ammoland’s Dean Weingarten. The Times video includes remarks by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol Chief Greg Bovino asserted Pretti had “brandished” a weapon, while available videos of the event clearly show Pretti did not have a gun in his hand.

What might have seemed incredible only days before the Minneapolis shooting now is raising eyebrows, and hints of hypocrisy, especially when the National Review quotes former President Bill Clinton, who wrote, “Over the course of a lifetime, we face only a few moments where the decisions we make and the actions we take will shape our history for years to come. This is one of them…It is up to all of us who believe in the promise of American democracy to stand up, speak out, and show that our nation still belongs to We the People.”

Likewise, Giffords—the gun prohibition lobbying group second only to Everytown for Gun Safety—also weighed in, observing that Pretti, who was armed with a Sig semi-auto and a couple of spare magazines, was “a lawful gun owner who was protesting in his community.”

National Review also quotes a statement from the Brady campaign, describing Pretti as “a law-abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit.”

For years, both lobbying groups have portrayed legally-armed citizens as dangerous for having “hidden handguns.” They have consistently lobbied against concealed carry, reciprocity and Constitutional carry. But now suddenly, because a man who had suffered a broken rib in a confrontation with federal agents a week before his fatal encounter, according to CNN, has died, these gun control groups are defending Pretti’s carrying of a concealed handgun.

Lost in all of this were early reports Mr. Pretti allegedly did not have the required photo ID or his carry permit to be packing legally under Minnesota statute. If that is the case, the obvious question would be “Why, not?”

In its article bylined by the National Review editors, the blistering question is asked, “At what point, one must ask, did they all turn into Wayne LaPierre?”

Amid this controversy, something else was recently added to the mix, and it is alarming.

Fox News recently reported on what it calls “assassination culture,” which it defines as a “public tolerance of politically motivated violence.” Even more worrisome, Newsweek said a new national survey by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) revealed this phenomenon is increasing “especially among women.”

According to the Fox report, NCRI has been studying this “assassination culture” since before the slaying of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, in front of a huge crowd at a Utah university last summer.

Recent history includes two attempted assassinations of Donald Trump on the campaign trail in 2024, and the slaying of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

The introduction of the NCRI report puts it bluntly: “Following the July 13, 2024 attempted assassination of President Trump, tolerance – and even advocacy – for political violence appears to have surged, especially among politically left-leaning segments of the population.”

A few lines later, the introduction notes, “The reports found widespread justification for lethal violence – including assassination – among younger, highly online, and ideologically left-aligned users.”

Recall how last year Everytown launched its “TrainSMART” firearms safety training program? One veteran gun owner who took the course suggested it was a waste of time and money, but it does indicate those on the left are beginning to realize guns aren’t going away, and that people have a right protected by the constitution to carry firearms for any number of reasons, including self-defense.

That Pretti showed up at a demonstration packing a sidearm and died as a result has put an uncomfortable spotlight on this right, which the gun ban bunch has been trying to outlaw for decades. Perhaps now the gun prohibitionists may understand—even if for the wrong reasons—why tens of millions of gun owners and organizations such as NRA, Gun Owners of America, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Second Amendment Foundation have fought so hard to keep that from happening.

The proverbial shoe is now on the other foot. We will see how well it fits, and whether it causes blisters.

Murders Down, Gun Ownership Thrives; Can Antis Talk Around This?

Anti-Gunners Just Obliterated the Greatest Gun Control Myth


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman




from https://ift.tt/QcUiEYu
via IFTTT

NAGR’s Taylor Rhodes on Lobbying, Litigation, and 2026 ~ VIDEO

LOVELAND, Colo. — (AmmoLand.com) — I had a chat with Taylor Rhodes, the communications director, from the National Association for Gun Rights. This interview was part of a piece I did for “Concealed Carry Magazine.”

Rhodes and I discussed the Association as well as its sister organization, the National Foundation for Gun Rights. NAGR is a 501(c)(4) lobby and advocacy organization and the Foundation is a 501(c)(3) litigation group.

Our conversation was in mid-2025, so some of the material is dated. However, if you want to watch it in full, you can check it out HERE or in the embed above. There’s plenty to take in and learn about NAGR.

National Association for Gun Rights and National Foundation for Gun Rights

National Association for Gun Rights is a 501(c)(4) lobby group and was founded in 2000 by Dudley Brown. NAGR was formed as a national group that came from Brown’s Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a state-level Colorado organization. The National Foundation for Gun Rights is one of several sister organizations and is a 501(c)(3) used for litigation.

“The National Association was founded in direct response to there not really being a group that was taking a hard, no compromise stance in state legislatures, primarily on the constitutional carry issue,” Rhodes said. “We are proud now to have 29 constitutional carry states around the country, most of which NAGR played a very large role in if, if it wasn’t the reason that it is law today and most of those states.”

Rhodes said the majority of the funds NAGR receives goes directly into lobbying. The organization is working in both D.C. as well as on the state level. “We have a D.C. office, well, it’s actually in Alexandria, where we lobby on Capitol Hill,” he explained.

The Foundation was formed sometime over the last decade. But, Rhodes said they didn’t really blossom into what they are today until 2022. The foundation “didn’t grow to what it is today until after the Bruen decision a few years ago,” Rhodes noted.

Lawsuits

There are a number of lawsuits that the Foundation has been involved in lately. Rhodes said that the call to bring the fight to the judicial branch came from their membership.

“Ultimately we are only as powerful as our members, right? And our members were almost demanding that we start filing lawsuits,” Rhodes said. “That’s what we did. And essentially just worked up the Foundation. We now have Hannah Hill that’s doing a fantastic job of running that Foundation and really keeping us on track in our legal work.”

Some of the legal battles the Foundation has gotten involved in pertain to so-called “assault weapons” bans, magazine bans, waiting periods, and 18-to-20-year-old bans.

“We’ve been involved with cases such as Lawrence DeMonico, Rare Breed trigger case,” Rhodes said. “We have really taken on a whole nother level of activism through the courts and trying to take back what the left has stolen from us.”

The White House

All the top five national Second Amendment advocacy groups and/or their sister organizations have been in communications with the Trump Administration. Whether groups are interacting directly with White House contacts, the Department of Justice, and/or someone else in the administration, they’ve all indicated that there’s open lines of communications.

NAGR has communicated with the current administration. They actually have a special and direct link to it — as well as the DOJ.

“I can’t say all that much about it, but I will say we have been in contact with the White House,” Rhodes teased. “Actually, our former chairman, Dave Warrington, is now the chief White House counsel, which is huge.

“Also, Harmeet Dhillon, who ran the law firm that we were running many of our lawsuits through —  the Rare Breed Trigger one being, being the flagship — is actually assistant attorney general now. We do have pathways into the White House and we’re hoping that this presidential term turns out to be a good one.”

The Plan for 2026

“We have a couple of things that are on the top of our agenda,” Rhodes said. “Actually, when the presidency changed from Democrat to Republican, we launched our program for freedom, which we uniquely coined Make America Armed Again. This is a multi-point plan to take back the rights that the Obama Administration and even past Republican administrations have pushed on us.”

Some of the initiatives that NAGR and the Foundation are pushing for include:

  • H.R.645 – National Constitutional Carry Act
  • H.R.850 – SHUSH Act
  • H.R.2395 – SHORT Act
  • Abolishing the ATF — or at least halving their budget
  • Continuing to overturn any Biden Era executive orders

As for any litigation that the Foundation might be pursuing in the future, Rhodes was mum. “As of right now, I’m not at liberty to say,” he said. “We’re always speaking to our attorneys about what makes sense. We always calculate the risk of losing.”

And More…

Rhodes and I talked further about other initiatives the organizations are involved. We also discussed groups they’ve been working with.

“We’re always open to working with groups as long as we are not going to compromise on behalf of our members,” Rhodes explained. “And that’s something that we always make sure of before we get in bed with anyone.”

The National Association for Gun Rights — along with the other national groups — is working at the tip of the spear to safeguard the Second Amendment. Learn more about what they’re up to by tuning into our interview in full here.

ATF Intervenes in Forced Reset Trigger Patent Lawsuit for “Public Safety”


About John Petrolino

John Petrolino is a US Merchant Marine Officer, writer, author of Decoding Firearms: An Easy to Read Guide on General Gun Safety & Use and NRA certified pistol, rifle, and shotgun instructor living under and working to change New Jersey’s draconian and unconstitutional gun laws. You can find him on the web at www.johnpetrolino.com on twitter at @johnpetrolino, facebook at @thepenpatriot and on instagram @jpetrolinoiii .John Petrolino




from https://ift.tt/OAk9JLR
via IFTTT

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

DOJ Filing on Forced Reset Triggers Contradicts Pledges and Complicates Midterms

How is the administration siccing enforcers on citizens for owning gun parts it disapproves of consistent with “us[ing] its full might to protect … Second Amendment rights”? And do they think it will help them inspire enthusiasm at the polls? (ATF/Facebook)
“@TheJusticeDept  just filed an anti-gun statement of interest in Rare Breed Triggers’ lawsuit against @HoffmanTactical,” Gun Owners of  America posted on X Monday. “It says @ATFHQ  has a “strong interest… in limiting the sale and distribution of FRTs” or forced reset triggers.”

Read the full, anti-gun filing where @TheJusticeDept reveals its unconstitutional plans to hamstring ownership of forced reset triggers here,” GOA added, posting a copy of the “Statement of Interest of the United States of America” filed Monday in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

That makes fair the question “Why?” since it’s not in the interests of the millions of gun owners who voted for a Trump administration based on promises he repeatedly made to roaring and adoring crowds:

“Right from the beginning, for four incredible years it was my honor to be the best friend gun owners have ever had in the White House, by far. Now I stand before you with a very simple promise: Your Second Amendment will always be safe with me as your president when I’m back in the Oval Office,” Trump promised to resulting exuberance. “No one will lay a finger on your firearms. It’s not going to happen…”

Inarguably the administration has been “better” on the Second Amendment than any in our lifetimes, as exemplified by positive actions like filing briefs against bans on so-called “assault weapons” and standard capacity magazines, repealing “zero tolerance” of minor FFL errors, reviewing rules including “engaged in business” restrictions, supporting challenges to Hawaii’s restrictive carry laws, investigating “pattern or practice” by the Los Angeles County Sheriff for “slow walking” concealed carry permits, working on rights restoration and working to defund grants and foreign aid for gun control advocacy groups.

But it then turns around and in a seemingly bipolar move does things like backing NFA registration of untaxed firearms (to the exploitative delight of anti-gun groups).

Every infringement also contradicts the  promise made by AG Pam Bondi in her April 8 “all hands” memo from last year, where she pledged:

“For too long, the Second Amendment, which establishes the fundamental individual right of Americans to keep and bear arms, has been treated as a second-class right. No more. It is the policy of this Department of Justice to use its full might to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”

The purpose of that memorandum was to introduce the Second Amendment Task Force – an idea that seemed to have great political value at the time, until it became apparent that no gun owner representation meant everything would be decided by careerists with political stakes in the game. One wonders how many infringements would be advanced if groups like GOA or Firearms Policy Coalition had advisory seats at the table to help caution against missteps before they are made. You don’t have to contradict yourself and backtrack too often before people begin to suspect you’re insincere and will only tell voters what they want to hear long enough to secure their votes.

At some point, that no longer works, and while most gun voters, aware of the Democrats’ prohibitionist agenda, will no doubt continue to vote Republican, it’s fair to wonder how often fire can be doused from bellies to where enough stay home on election day.

Like we just saw happen in Virginia, with the resulting and completely predictable feeding frenzy against guns as empowered Democrats gorge themselves.

“You gotta win the midterms ’cause, if we don’t win the midterms, it’s just gonna be – I mean, they’ll find a reason to impeach me,” Reuters reported on President Trump speaking to Republican lawmakers. “I’ll get impeached.”

Hard left Democrats – and that’s the ascending wing in the party – won’t be satisfied with just that.

“Jennifer Welch to Jim Acosta: Dems must mass prosecute Trump, Musk, Republicans,” The Hill reports in its RISING program that focuses on emerging political and cultural trends. It would be a mistake to just dismiss this as “progressive” rantings. Trump’s statement shows the administration takes the threat seriously. And any Republican who does not realize that the struggle for America’s soul is anything short of existential has not been paying attention.

Simply put, the administration needs to stop with the infringements and rights advocates need to commit themselves to not just voting but doing everything in their power to recruit their fellow gun owners to understand the stakes. Short of that, the political results – and resulting vindictiveness – will be predictable.

The one factor that’s never been sufficiently impressed on institutional GOP thinking is that no matter who wins, there will be a core of gun owners who will not comply.  Democrat Justice Department and Democrat-appointed federal judges, aided and abetted by media cheerleaders, will make sure such people are reviled as insurrectionists/domestic terrorists.

With defiance comes terrible individual risks as we see in the case of Indie Guns owner Lawrence Michael DeStefano. If you opt to go that route, just be mindful that you’ll basically be on your own: A GiveSendGo account established earlier this month to help him defend himself against a state with virtually unlimited resources has only managed to attract $490 at this writing out of $620,000 requested, despite hundreds of thousands of gun owners knowing about the story through detailed reporting by Lee “The Gun Writer” Williams, and on the popular Guns and Gadgets YouTube channel.

It sure makes voting seem the better alternative. And it would sure be nice if the administration stopped discouraging that.

ATF Intervenes in Forced Reset Trigger Patent Lawsuit for “Public Safety”


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea




from https://ift.tt/uZbUDdG
via IFTTT