Tuesday, December 1, 2020

Gun Prohibitionists Exploiting Suicide to Advance Disarmament Agenda

Danger Red Flag Warning
If only red flag laws were universal and gun locks were mandatory? Really?

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Gun advocates take the lead in embracing suicide prevention message,” The Oregonian reported Saturday. “Gun owners and health professionals are coming together to devise new solutions to the public health crisis of suicide.”

“The newly influential voices of gun owners in public health are changing the conversation — and not only in the Pacific Northwest,” the article explains. “In recent years, similar state coalitions have sprung up across the country. New Hampshire is the home of the original Gun Shop Project, a mix of firearm retailers, range owners, and firearm rights advocates who helped develop materials and training to prevent firearm suicide.”

Such coalitions can be a positive development, especially as the story recalls a show of hands at “a gun-control conference” where only two “health professionals” in an audience of 200 admitted to owning a gun. Introducing people whose exposure to guns is limited to people who know what they’re talking about has potential, assuming some may be open-minded and persuadable.

Just remember, people who are highly educated in one specialty can be just as “provincial,” uneducated, and biased as they accuse gun owners of being. That’s the main reason why medical doctors who pose as experts qualified to offer “gun safety” prescriptions need to be challenged to cite their credentials, and why those who have none but are instead parroting political talking points can be rightly dismissed as “gunquacks.”

While a commitment to educate about and reduce suicides is commendable, care needs to be taken to make certain it relies on reality and is not used to infringe on rights with due process-ignoring “red flag” confiscations and mandatory “lock up your safety” edicts – all enforced by men with guns who will use them if they're not obeyed.

So naturally, the group that has once more reinvented itself as Brady United Against Gun Violence (to mask its original goal of banning handguns, then “controlling” them, and then presenting themselves as the arbiters of “gun safety”) has teamed with the “progressive” professional propagandists of the Ad Council to, as Rahm Emanuel put it, “never … let a crisis go to waste.” They’ve come up with a well-funded, multi-media “End Family Fire” campaign, that not only stumps for compulsory storage but also uses suicides to further the citizen disarmament agenda.

That their “one-size fits all” advice does not work for all situations, and can actually cause harm if people follow it, is left unsaid.

These are, after all, politically-motivated, slickly produced advertisements, as much as the illusionists behind them want us to believe they are “public service announcements.” They’re even expanding their glossary of terms: the ubiquitous “gun violence” is now joined by another invented term of convenience, “gun suicide,” used no fewer than eight times in the initial campaign press release.

What we’re dealing with here is yet another rich Democrat-funded “Astroturf” campaign using slick Madison Avenue ad techniques to make it look “grassroots.” A good indicator of that is they have been around for several months now but have at this writing only been able to attract a little over 1,000 Twitter and 2,000 Facebook followers.

Also left unsaid in all the media noise is an inconvenient truth about suicide that doesn’t fit the parroted narrative, and that’s the prevalence of suicide in cultures where guns are not allowed.

“In Japan, more people died from suicide last month than from Covid in all of 2020,” CNN reported Sunday. “In 2016, Japan had a suicide mortality rate of 18.5 per 100,000 people, second only to South Korea in the Western Pacific region…”

That’s comparable with the armed-to-the-teeth United States, with some states registering significantly lower rates.

The bottom line: Many factors are involved in suicides and many measures and options may exist to help prevent them, admittedly including separating a citizen who is a proven danger from his guns and committing him into custodial care (with full due process protections). But there is no one solution that will work for everyone and at all times.

The “go after everybody's guns first” approach also ignores those who may be most in need of help, the “prohibited person” underclass population, more prone to ravages of unemployment, drug abuse, poverty, and general depression,  that possesses “illegal” guns. And don’t forget, guns are also banned in jails and prisons, both of which suffer from alarming suicide rates. Ironically, they’re actually highest in California, which imposes “safe storage” and has been given an “A” grade for its laws by Giffords.

Also, and this runs against the “gun control” contention that police should be the “Only Ones” with guns, is the longstanding inconvenient truth that more police die by suicide than in the line of duty.

As economist John Lott and co-author John E. Whitley observed in The University of Chicago Law School’s The Journal of Law & Economics:

It is frequently assumed that safe‐storage gun laws reduce accidental gun deaths and total suicides, while the possible impact on crime rates is ignored. We find no support that safe‐storage laws reduce either juvenile accidental gun deaths or suicides. Instead, these storage requirements appear to impair people’s ability to use guns defensively. Because accidental shooters also tend to be the ones most likely to violate the new law, safe‐storage laws increase violent and property crimes against law‐abiding citizens with no observable offsetting benefit in terms of reduced accidents or suicides.

A common factor among suicides is the belief that no other choice is available. Politically restricting choices for everyone is not the answer and ignoring what the Founders deemed “necessary to the security of a free State” is nothing short of cultural suicide.

Also see: New York Times Champions Suicide, Except with Guns


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

The post Gun Prohibitionists Exploiting Suicide to Advance Disarmament Agenda appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/39x9qOV
via IFTTT

Democrat Raphael Warnock Mocks Christians in Support of Gun-Control ~ VIDEO

Opinion
By Dan Wos
Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Running against Georgia Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler, Democrat challenger Raphael Warnock chooses to insult his way to the Senate.

Georgia lawmakers enacted the Safe Carry Protection Act in 2014. Due to the number of attacks in Gun-Free Zones, the Safe Carry Protection Act was created to give people The ability to defend themselves and not become soft targets in such places as churches, school zones, and government buildings. The bill passed the Georgia General Assembly, passing the House of Representatives by a vote of 112-58 and the Senate by 37-18. In typical left-wing fashion, many anti-gun advocates quickly labeled the bill the “Guns Everywhere Bill,” in the hopes of discrediting it and creating a false visual narrative for the irrationally fearful and uninformed anti-gun crowd.

For decades gun owners have tried to help gun grabbing legislators and anti-gun politicians understand the importance of self-defense in public places. Even given countless studies and public events showing guns being used to save lives, Anti-Gunners continue to ignore the truth.

According to a study called Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun by Florida Criminologist Gary Kleck, potential lives saved by armed law-abiding citizens, exceeds 2 1/2 million per year in America alone.

On November 5, 2017, Stephan Willeford used his AR 15 to stop a heinous attack on Churchgoers at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. The gun grabbers used the event to push a white supremacy narrative and continued irrational fear around semi-automatic rifles; completely negating the fact that a good guy with a gun saved innocent lives that day.

Jack Wilson, another good guy with a gun, was able to stop an attacker at the West Freeway Church of Christ near Fort Worth, Texas in 2020. If it wasn’t for Mr. Wilson, many more would have likely been killed. The anti-gun crowd used this situation to push for more gun regulations, completely ignoring the fact that it was a good gun that stopped the bad guy.

Consistent with the left-wing anti-gun agenda, Democrat Senate candidate Reverend Raphael Warnock continues to feed the minds of the misinformed, fearful, anti-gun crowd. Ignoring the evidence of guns saving lives in churches, Warnock makes fun of those who believe in self-defense.

In a video Warnock said “somebody decided that they had a bright idea to pass a piece of legislation that will allow for guns and concealed weapons to be carried in churches.”

It actually was a bright idea but Warnock was being sarcastic. He continued to mock anyone who would carry a gun in church, saying churches are the last place firearms should be allowed.

We often wonder how the anti-gun left can look reality in the face and deny it in support of their political agenda. As the years go by, it becomes clear that politics on the left side of the political spectrum is at the top of the hierarchical list of values; higher than religion and even life itself. The left-wing agenda has consumed many who proclaim religion to be their highest value including Reverand, Rapheal Warnock who happens to be running for the Senate on January 5th 2020. Mocking those who want to be able to protect themselves, their families and their fellow parishioners may win him points among his Democrat peers, but doesn't sit well with folks who value life over politics.


Dan Wos

About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

www.goodgunbadguy.net

Dan Wos
Dan Wos

The post Democrat Raphael Warnock Mocks Christians in Support of Gun-Control ~ VIDEO appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/37qch9J
via IFTTT

Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs & NRA Fight NJ Carry Laws

FPC, SAF, NJ2AS Challenge New Jersey Handgun Carry Ban
The NRA-ILA and ANJRPC challenge the New Jersey handgun carry ban. IMG iStock 884194316

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action partnered with The Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs in a lawsuit against the state of New Jersey for infringing on our members’ right to carry.

New Jersey’s may-issue statute also requires that people justify their need to carry. And even though the Supreme Court said that self-defense is “the central component” of the Second Amendment, the desire to defend yourself is insufficient justification under New Jersey law. This makes it all but impossible for law-abiding gun owners to receive a permit, which is required to lawfully carry a handgun in New Jersey.

One of the Plaintiffs in the lawsuit is a firearms instructor with a current federal and New Jersey firearms retail license. But when he went to submit his application for a permit at his local police department, he was told not to even bother because it would just be denied for lacking a justifiable need.

“That is egregious but pretty common in New Jersey,” said Michael Jean, NRA-ILA Director of Litigation. “The Supreme Court said that the Second Amendment ‘takes out of the hands of government … the power to decide on a case-by-case basis whether the right is really worth insisting upon.’ But that’s what officials in New Jersey do when they reject applicants who they believe haven’t justified their need to exercise their rights. This lawsuit’s aim is to put an end to that.”

The case is Mazahreh v. Grewal. It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Coalition of New Jersey Firearms Owners also joined the lawsuit.


About Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs:

The Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, Inc. is the official NRA State Association in New Jersey. Our mission is to implement all of the programs and activities at the state level that the NRA does at the national level. This mission includes the following: To support and defend the constitutional rights of the people to keep and bear arms. To take immediate action against any legislation at the local, state, and federal level that would infringe upon these rights. Visit: www.anjrpc.org

Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs

The post Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs & NRA Fight NJ Carry Laws appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/36sxjVW
via IFTTT

The Second Amendment Foundation Challenges Washington Gun-Control

Constitution Gun iStock-648978888
The SAF, NRA, and two Washington state gun retailers challenge gun-control Initiative 1639 IMG iStock-648978888

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation, National Rifle Association, two Washington state gun retailers, and three private citizens have filed an appeal brief with the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in their challenge of gun control Initiative 1639, a measure adopted two years ago in the Evergreen State.

The 45-page brief asserts I-1639 “infringes the rights protected by the Second Amendment and enjoyed by law-abiding adults of all ages. The interstate sales ban violates the Interstate Commerce Clause.” A district court judge in Tacoma dismissed the case in August, and plaintiffs promptly filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court in San Francisco.

The initiative prohibits young adults ages 18-20 from purchasing and owning so-called “semiautomatic assault rifles,” which it defined as literally any self-loading rifle, regardless of caliber. Tens of millions of semiautomatic rifles are in use today by law-abiding citizens of all ages for a variety of endeavors including hunting, competition, predator and varmint control, recreational shooting and personal/home protection.

“We’re asking the Ninth Circuit to reverse a ruling by the lower federal district court, and remand this case back for further action,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “The constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens should never be subject to a popular vote, and we are hopeful the appeals court agrees.”

Plaintiffs are represented by Seattle attorney Joel B. Ard and Spokane attorney David K. DeWolf. The case is known as Mitchell v. Atkins.



The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing, and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

Second Amendment Foundation

The post The Second Amendment Foundation Challenges Washington Gun-Control appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/3qluVrR
via IFTTT

Ohio: Senate Committee to Consider No Duty to Retreat Legislation

NRA-ILA Beretta
Ohio Senate to consider “No Duty to Retreat” legislation. IMG NRA-ILA

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- On Wednesday, the Senate Government Oversight and Reform Committee will consider No Duty to Retreat legislation, Senate Bill 383.  Please contact committee members and ask that they SUPPORT Senate Bill 383.

CLICK HERE TAKE ACTION

Senate Bill 383 strengthens Ohio’s self-defense laws by stating that individuals have no duty to retreat from a place that they are lawfully present before using force in defense of themselves or others.  Previously the law only applied to residences and vehicles, however, SB 383 expands that to allow for law-abiding gun owners to be able to defend themselves without being required to retreat from any place they are allowed to be.

Again, please contact members of the Senate Government Oversight and Reform Committee and ask that they SUPPORT Senate Bill 383.


About NRA-ILA:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

The post Ohio: Senate Committee to Consider No Duty to Retreat Legislation appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/36ptKQq
via IFTTT

Broward Sheriff’s Office Stands By While Violent Home Break-In Drags On ~ VIDEO

Opinion

Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- Wave of the Future!

Earlier this month in south FL (Broward County, which includes the Miami metro area), a disabled senior citizen (disabled from childhood by polio) frantically called the BCSO to report that a man was breaking into his home.

The suspect (unknown to the resident) was pounding on the resident’s locked door, eventually slamming his body into it, breaking the glass.

Eighteen BCSO deputies were dispatched and arrived at the scene within minutes, but did not approach the house where the felony was happening!

Minutes passed with no action on the part of deputies who remained some distance away, despite the fact that the disabled resident was in obvious grave danger and had informed the 911 Operator multiple times that he was scared to death, armed, and might have to shoot when the door gave way.

More minutes passed with no action on the part of deputies, who had long-since arrived!

Over the phone, the 911 operator can hear glass breaking. Still, no action on the part of deputies!

A neighbor steps out of her house who sees what is happening, also calls 911 and yells at the suspect to go away.

The suspect walks over to the next house.

That neighbor and others are now flooding 911 lines reporting the attempted home invasion(s), joining with the affected resident’s desperate call.

Still, deputies are nowhere to be seen, much less do anything.

Eventually, the suspect walks over to several uniformed deputies he could see and is taken into custody without further incident.

He is already out of bail!

Not surprisingly, the SO has refused to answer all questions about this incident and has put-out the usual, tired boiler-plate:

“The Sheriff's Office constantly reviews and assesses its responses to emergency calls in order to provide the highest level of service to the public… blah, blah, blah”

Welcome to our “New Era of Policing,” brought to you by liberal/Marxist politicians.

Individual police officers know and understand that they are the continual target of liberal prosecutors and judges, who want police de-funded, and who just can’t wait to throw them in jail.

They know and understand that shooting a violent felon, even when completely justified, is an automatic career-ender.

They know and understand that confronting any violent suspect will not have a happy ending and that whatever physical action they take to protect themselves and innocent citizens will be denigrated, criticized, picked-apart, and will result in demotion, probably termination, plus criminal (and civil) charges against them. They’ll probably be unemployed and bankrupted, likely find themselves in prison.

They know and understand that liberal sheriffs, police chiefs, mayors, governors will not stand behind them, will not defend them, but will casually throw them to the wolves, while themselves cynically marching right along beside violent rioters!

Many LEOs are thus departing the profession in disgust, and fear!

In the interim, can you really blame the few who remain for indecisive “tactical loitering,” as my friend and esteemed colleague, Ron Borsch, fondly calls it?

Neighbors, some of whom are professing liberals, in the foregoing episode are shocked, indignant, disgusted, and fearful. Well they, and residents of other Democrat-controlled areas, had better get used to this “new normal!”

Liberals need to be careful what they wish for. In Broward County, their wish has been granted.

“Betrayal is the only truth that sticks.” ~ Arthur Miller

/John


About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc

As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.

It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com

 

Defense Training International, Inc

The post Broward Sheriff’s Office Stands By While Violent Home Break-In Drags On ~ VIDEO appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/36p3PIA
via IFTTT

Firearms Policy Coalition Adds Attorney Anthony Miranda to Team

Armed Scholar
Anthony Miranda host of Armed Scholar is joining the FPC team. IMG Armed Scholar

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Yesterday, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that attorney Anthony Miranda, founder of the popular Armed Scholar channel on YouTube and other social media platforms, has joined the FPC Law team. Miranda joins FPC Law’s first and only dedicated Second Amendment legal and research program in the United States.

Beginning immediately, Miranda’s work will focus on expanding FPC’s constitutional rights litigation and providing FPC’s members with information about litigation and regulatory changes that affect individuals and others in the firearms ecosystem.

“For the past two years we have been building an in-house team of advocates with many skills, strengths, experiences, and an unwavering desire to restore and defend the Second Amendment and the People’s fundamental rights, liberties, and freedoms,” explained Adam Kraut, FPC’s Director of Legal Strategy. “Today, I’m pleased to announce we have added yet another talented individual to our ranks. Anthony Miranda has shown the type of drive to create value and help individuals exercise their rights. His joining the FPC Law team will allow us to not only expand the number and type of cases we can litigate but improve how we communicate with the People we love and serve. We are eager to begin working with Mr. Miranda on the front lines of the fight for Second Amendment rights.”

“I am excited and honored to join the Firearms Policy Coalition team,” said Miranda. “Over the last year my focus on YouTube has been to bridge the gap between the legal world and real world. This was all done with the hope of educating the average person on important legal battles that are raging behind the scenes that will ultimately impact our right to keep and bear arms. I am so thankful that the people who supported me and the Arched Scholar channel will now directly benefit from my work as an attorney on FPC’s legal team. I want to thank all of my family, friends, and amazing followers for your support and encouragement. I am very excited to immediately get to work restoring your right to keep and bear arms, especially in states hostile to our rights.”

Individuals who wish to support FPC’s litigation, research, and other programs, including Mr. Miranda’s legal action, education, and outreach with FPC Law, can do so by joining FPC at JoinFPC.org.

Firearms Policy Coalition and its FPC Law are the nation’s next-generation advocates leading the Second Amendment litigation space, having recently filed several major federal Second Amendment lawsuits including challenges to the State of Pennsylvania’s and Allegheny County’s carry restrictions (Cowey v. Mullen), Philadelphia’s Gun Permit Unit policies and practices (Fetsurka v. Outlaw), Pennsylvania’s ban on carrying by adults under 21 years of age (Lara v. Evanchick), California’s Handgun Ban and “Roster” laws (Renna v. Becerra), Maryland’s carry ban (Call v. Jones), New Jersey’s carry ban (Bennett v. Davis), New York City’s carry ban (Greco v. New York City), the federal ban on the sale of handguns and handgun ammunition by federal firearm licensees (FFLs) to adults under 21 years of age (Reese v. BATFE), and others, with many more cases being prepared today. To follow these and other legal cases FPC is actively working on, visit the Legal Action section of FPC’s website or follow FPC on InstagramTwitterFacebookYouTube.


About Firearms Policy Coalition

Firearms Policy Coalition (firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend constitutional rights—especially the right to keep and bear arms—advance individual liberty, and restore freedom through litigation and legal action, legislative and regulatory action, education, outreach, grassroots activism, other programs. FPC Law is the nation’s largest public interest legal team focused on the Second Amendment and adjacent fundamental rights including freedom of speech and due process, conducting litigation, research, scholarly publications, and amicus briefing, among other efforts.

The post Firearms Policy Coalition Adds Attorney Anthony Miranda to Team appeared first on AmmoLand.com.



from https://ift.tt/3qbueBo
via IFTTT