Another crazy move by gun-banning Democrats has generated significant attention and debate amongst the 3D printing community as they have become the next target of the Dems’ ban-everything movement.
New York legislators have proposed a bill that would require criminal background checks for buyers of three-dimensional printers capable of producing firearms or firearm components. This legislation comes amidst rising concerns over the ease with which individuals can produce “ghost guns” using 3D printing technology.
The bill mandates that a retailer like Amazon selling a 3D printer in New York state that can print a firearm or its components must request and receive criminal history data about the purchaser from the Division of Criminal Justice Services.
Assembly Bill A8132 2023-2024 Legislative Session
Relates to criminal history background checks for the purchase of three-dimensional printers capable of creating firearms
The division will then have 15 business days to review the criminal history [aka a waiting period] and decide whether the purchaser is disqualified from owning or carrying a firearm. Retailers are prohibited from selling such printers unless they receive written approval from the Division of Criminal Justice Services.
Critics argue that this is an overreach and an unnecessary regulation. One comment from the Reddit thread on the topic mused, “Are they going to add background checks for lathes? Because that makes a much better firearm than a 3D printer.” Another user noted the ease with which rudimentary firearms can be made from common hardware store items and pointed to the U.S. Army technical manual TM 31-210, which outlines how to produce basic firearms without the need for advanced technology like 3D printers.
However, Democrat supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to prevent the unchecked proliferation of firearms and ensure public safety. Yet, the bill’s definition of a “three-dimensional printer” is broad, encompassing any computer-driven device that can produce a three-dimensional object from a digital model. Some commentators noted that this could include conventional machine tools, extending its reach beyond just 3D printers.
The debate also brought to light concerns about the diminishing culture of DIY and how modern society views those who prefer to make or repair things themselves. Some commenters felt that there is a growing disconnect, with legislative bodies often viewing DIY culture with suspicion.
A noteworthy aspect of the debate was the realization by commentators of the legislators’ blatant ignorance or misunderstanding regarding the specifics of technology and DIY culture. The 3D printing community is shocked that the Democrat bill is driven more by fear and lack of understanding than by a genuine effort to ensure public safety. Pro-gun activists say, “Welcome to the club.”
More and more people are now receiving their daily red pills on implications for personal freedoms, the right to DIY, and the potential overreach of Democratic-controlled legislative bodies. Only time will tell how this legislation will evolve and whether it will set a precedent for other states like New Jersey to follow.
from https://ift.tt/cVfMuH6
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment