Second Amendment Sanctuary resolutions have been passed in several states, and legislation surrounding guns continue to pop up around the ...
from
Friday, January 31, 2020
Gun owners rally at the Capitol
Facebook group calls on 2nd amendment supporters to muster in Bedford, Campbell Counties
Gunmen, Some In Masks, Swarm KY Capitol For 2nd Amendment Rally
Haywood commissioners to hear 'Constitution protecting' resolution on Monday
Guns & Gadgets Talking Gun Control With DICK HELLER
Free event: KTTH GOP gubernatorial forum in Tacoma
Close Vote: Fargo ND Investigates Removal of Zoning Ban on Selling Firearms
U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- When some city residents of Fargo, North Dakota, applied to renew their Federal Firearms License (FFL), they were denied. The reason? Fargo had placed a ban on residential sales of firearms in 2001. Because the information in our digital society is so easily available, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, (BATFE) knew of this prohibition and was enforcing it.
In Fargo, North Dakota, the city commission considered removing the two-decade old ban on the commercial sale of firearms from a residence. The ban was put in place as part of a planning and zoning code. The City Commission meeting was held on 27 January, 2020. The discussion starts at about 8:00 in the video.
North Dakota has a strong preemption law, which prohibits local governments from passing restrictions on the exercise of Second Amendment rights.
The zoning code appears to violate the state preemption law. Some case law argues zoning law is exempt from state preemption. This may be the case when the law applies to all commercial sales, not to firearms sales alone.
Commissioner Tony Gehrig explained how a person transferring firearms through an FFL generally worked to provide a useful service.
A predominant question was: Why was this added to the code in 2001? No one was certain. It was implemented by an ordinance amendment. Deputy Mayor & City Commissioner Dave Piepkorn thought it might have been about someone commercially reloading shotgun shells in their garage. Piepkorn stated:
My opinion, I am not comfortable with a gun store in my neighborhood. I don't want to get into the whole Second Amendment.
Commissioner John Strand seemed dismissive of the idea of exercising Second Amendment rights as antiquated and old fashioned:
I can't imagine why we are doing this. In this culture, in this day and age, do we want guns everywhere? Do we want bullets everywhere? Do we want ammunition everywhere? Do we want everybody packing guns? Is this where we are aiming?
Give the comments above, the votes to investigate the removal of the ban of firearm sales in residential areas were predictable.
Commissioner Piepkorn voted against investigating the possible removal of the ban.
Mayor Mahoney voted to investigate removing the ban.
Commissioner Gehrig voted to investigate the removal of the ban.
Commissioner Grindberg voted to investigate the removal of the ban.
Commissioner Strand voted against investigating the removal of the ban.
It was a close vote, two against, three for. This is in North Dakota, about a dubious ban on people being allowed to have a Federal Firearms license in their home. As Commissioner Gehrig noted, most FFLs in residences are for facilitating the purchase of firearms through the mail and over the Internet. An FFL in a residential area does the required background check with the FBI to facilitate the sale, just as a gun store anywhere else. Most neighbors of people with FFLs do not even know the neighbor has an FFL. This facilitates residents of the state in their legal purchase of firearms not commonly carried or available in the local gun store.
Private citizens have the right to reload all the shotgun shells they desire without a Federal Firearms License. They are prohibited from selling them for profit, unless they have the proper federal license.
In Fargo, the City Commissioners are all voted for at large, by the whole city. There are four City Commissioners and the Mayor on the City Commission.
About Dean Weingarten:
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.
The post Close Vote: Fargo ND Investigates Removal of Zoning Ban on Selling Firearms appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/31bHqKu
via IFTTT
Arizona county to vote on whether to declare itself a '2nd Amendment Sanctuary County'
America on the Brink of Ruin? Bring Back Gun-Safety Training
Opinion
Socialism Is An Anti-Gun-Rights Scourge: Socialists, out of the closet, vie for power in the halls of Congress
As the new year approaches, “All enemies foreign and domestic” has a new meaning, Bring Back Gun-Safety Training In Schools.
USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Mature Americans, those above the age of about 40, grew up educated and knowing that socialism is an anti-freedom abomination, dedicated to subjecting people to dictatorial rule, economic hardship, and armed control of the masses, without basic freedoms we enjoy here in America.
This poli-sci understanding and knowledge of truth has been lost, thanks, literally, to brainwashing in our school system which Alinsky-styled socialists have cleverly commandeered.
Children today have been taught to fear and hate firearms and gun owners. It’s not good to hate.
The dreaded and very real socialist “red threat” from communist Russia, the Chicom communist Chinese, brutal North Koreans, communist Cuba, a good segment of South America and the rest remains in play, though not on the nightly news as it once was. It has however been significantly replaced by a domestic enemy, socialists in our own Congress.
Sometimes championed by what passes for “news” today, they act completely against American values, including dramatically against our fundamental right to keep and bear arms. Socialists are dead set against an armed public, which they now fearlessly announce, because they know all too well it represents a threat to their absolute power. Historically, socialist regimes all disarm their subjects, frequently leading to genocide.
Classic adages apply: “Armed people are citizens, disarmed people are subjects.” “You can’t arm slaves and expect them to remain slaves.”
Socialists here, parading as “democrats,” seek disarmament too and make little effort to hide it, though they do single out “dangerous” guns while obscuring the truth they believe—all guns are dangerous and so should be subject to their total controls. With mass media propaganda to help them along, too much of our population has been snowed into believing that if we disarm the innocent, criminals will be controlled, the government will turn nice, and peace will reign.
The amazing thing is that this bizarre poppycock takes hold when repeated often enough. Any sort of marksmanship training that would clearly demonstrate otherwise is suppressed. When Americans took training for granted that was impossible. High schools used to have rifle teams competing. Back then, psychotic student mass murder was unheard of, Second Amendment support was staunch.
JPFO, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (www.jpfo.org) is calling for reestablishing basic marksmanship training and firearms education in public schools.
JPFO calls for funding an advertising campaign to the public to instill these basic values and principles: Guns are good and have significant social utility; guns save lives; guns stop crime, guns protect you, guns are why America is still free, and training is fun and a worthwhile pursuit.
In addition, JPFO recognizes that banning guns for citizens is infringement, banned by the U.S. Constitution, and politicians who suggest or introduce bills to that effect deserve to be removed from office, with prejudice, to prevent them from seeking office in the future. The growing tide of socialism, and with it the efforts to disarm the public, a precursor to dictatorial control and even genocide, must be turned back. JPFO deserves your support, with tax-exempt donations at this end-of-year time of giving, bringing messages you get from nowhere else.
Support JPFO, speaking truth to power: https://store.jpfo.org/11-donations
About Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, www.jpfo.org is America’s most aggressive civil-rights organization, dedicated to destroying the notion of ‘gun control’ as any kind of credible public-policy position. So-called ‘gun control’ does not control guns and doesn’t control criminal behavior. What it does is disarm the innocent, leaving them helpless in the face of criminals, tyrannical governments and genocide. History repeatedly proves this fact. Founded in 1989 by Aaron Zelman as a response to the Holocaust, JPFO speaks with the moral authority and tenacious commitment of survivors of persecution and knows that surrendering your personal and family safety to government protection courts disaster. You don’t have to be Jewish to fight by our side, you just have to love liberty.
The post America on the Brink of Ruin? Bring Back Gun-Safety Training appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/31bFdil
via IFTTT
Guns & Gadgets Talking Gun Control With DICK HELLER
U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- I was blessed to interview a true champion of the 2nd Amendment while attending SHOT Show 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Mr. Heller and I discuss the current climate of gun control and what the average, everyday American citizen can do to fight the anti-gun tyrants….and WIN! Dick Heller STILL fights for the 2nd Amendment on a daily basis. He shares with viewers his proven method to beat the anti-gun movement we are currently facing.
We also discuss his FAMOUS landmark case, District of Columbia v. Dick Heller, the immediate anti-gun actions taken by the then-mayor of DC, and how events such as the Sandy Hook shooting delayed further action.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept “unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock” violated this guarantee. It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias.
About Guns & Gadgets
About Jared J. Yanis
With over 20 years of experience in the law enforcement field, I have learned the numerous channels used by those who would love to see our 2nd Amendment rights stripped. Because of this, I am often able to bring you the news on new bills submitted at the local, state and federal levels that look to carry out those attacks. If you are new to the channel or want to stay up to date with the constant infringements on our Constitutional Right to Bear Arms, please subscribe to my YouTube Channel at www.youtube.com/GunsGadgets
GunsAndGadgets@charter.net
Guns & Gadgets
P. O. Box 940
Douglas, Massachusetts 01516
- https://www.facebook.com/GunsGadgets
- https://www.instagram.com/guns_and_gadgets
- https://twitter.com/jyanis
- https://gunstreamer.com/@Guns_and_Gadgets
- https://www.full30.com/channels/gunsandgadgets
Stay tuned to Guns & Gadgets, YOUR Source For 2nd Amendment News, for all of the news coming out of every corner of the country! Check back often and subscribe to stay out front of the gun-grabbers' agenda!
The post Guns & Gadgets Talking Gun Control With DICK HELLER appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/38XHAba
via IFTTT
North Carolina Counties Declare 2nd Amendment Sanctuary Status
By West Kentucky Star Staff
Scott responds to Vermont's growing Second Amendment 'sanctuary' movement
Gun owners from across Kentucky to rally at statehouse in Frankfort on Friday
LETTER: Rights under attack
Rudy resolution affirms 2nd Amendment support
Wichita Falls Fire and Police Museum in search of larger space
Norfolk council has rejected calls for a pro-Second Amendment resolution. So advocates are trying ...
RACE TO FILL THE 50TH
Thursday, January 30, 2020
Republican candidates for March primary visit Ballinger
Horry County may become a 2nd Amendment sanctuary, other cities make more gun laws
Gallia declared 2nd Amendment sanctuary
Virginia Legislature Officially Approves Gun Control
Pownal Select Board to consider 2nd Amendment sanctuary ballot article
WAUSAU - Over the airwaves Thursday morning, Democratic candidates for the 7th Congressional ...
Virginia: Threat Against Anti-Gun Activist Is An Alleged Hoax
Fairfax, VA –-(Ammoland.com)-On Saturday, Virginia anti-gun activist Joseph Sakran posted two images on his verified Twitter account, which he said was receiving death threats from pro-gun activists. Now it appears that the death threats he reported might have been a hoax. The Johns Hopkins Hospital surgeon has since deleted the images and all mentions of the threats.
The images were of a hand holding a pistol and text at the bottom of the paper that reads “The End is Near………”
Sakran claimed that someone put the picture under his windshield wipers of his car before VCDL's Lobby Day on January 20th. Virginia has been a hotbed for the gun debate since the Democrats seized control of the state and introduced radical gun control measures and 96% of the state declared themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries. Sakran said he struggled with the decision to post the pictures online.
“We have the opportunity and the responsibility to make communities safer for Americans,” Sakran wrote on Twitter. “For the person who thought they could silence me by threatening my life, you clearly know nothing about me….. Thank you for showing me that our movement is making a difference.”
Sakran said he informed law enforcement of the death threat, and they told him to stop discussing the matter on social media. AmmoLand contacted the Fairfax County Police, where Sakran lives to get a copy of the police report. According to the law enforcement agency, Sakran never filed a report or contacted them about any threat against him. The Post Millennial also reached out to the law enforcement agency and received the same answer that they gave AmmoLand.
The Baltimore Sun contacted Capitol Police in Richmond to see if they have had any reports against any gun control activist. The department told the Sun that they were unaware of any threats against Sakran or any other person. Sakran insinuated that the threat was due to Lobby Day and the tens of thousands of people that attended the rally.
Eagle-eyed internet users noticed the reflection of Sakran's garage in the windshield of his car. This fact indicates that for someone to leave the threatening image that would have to have broken into the doctor's house to leave the picture. It seems unlikely someone would break into a house to leave a note on a windshield of Sakran's car.
Sakran later claimed he found the alleged threat on his car when he was going to work and thought it was just an advertisement flyer. Days later, he looked at the flyer while cleaning his car and discovered it was a threat.
His statement brings up a couple of questions. The doctor posted a picture initially showing the flyer on his windshield, where he claimed he found it. If that was the case, why would he take a picture of a flyer if he didn’t know what it was? The threat is clearly visible in the picture. Also, wouldn't he think it is weird that someone broke into his garage to put an advertisement on his car? Some in the gun community believe that Sakran saying that he found it days later, is him trying to cover up his inconsistencies in his story.
Another fact that observers noticed was the picture of the image that Sakran says he brought in from his car has fewer creases than the picture of the image from where he found it. This fact leads many people to deduce that the picture of the image from after Sakran says he took it off his car was actually taken before someone put it on his windshield wiper.
Since all the inconsistencies in the story have surfaced, multiple publications have reached out to Sakran to see if the threats were a hoax. Sakran has gone dark and is not responding to any request for comments. He has also deleted all mentions of the threat across all his social media accounts.
AmmoLand tried reaching out to Sakran through multiple mediums, but the doctor has not responded by the time of the publication of this article.
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%'ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on leftist deplatforming methods and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, on Facebook at realjohncrump, or at www.crumpy.com.
The post Virginia: Threat Against Anti-Gun Activist Is An Alleged Hoax appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/2GDKPZi
via IFTTT
Man Charged with Rape of 13-Year-Old Girl
Candidate profile: Tulsi Gabbard
HD8: Tim Bonner Nominated as GOP Candidate for Special Election
Real Estate Business Helps Conservatives Move To Wyoming [VIDEO]
2nd Amendment Gaming: Spreading Gun Rights Message via Video Games
After a Huge, Peaceful Gun Rights Rally, Reframing it as Racist and Threatening Was Media Job One
Delaware bill seeks to clarify medical marijuana patients' 2nd Amendment rights
First county in Utah becomes Second Amendment Sanctuary
Sen. Wilkinson announces campaign for US Congress
The Laboratory of Democracy is Working, but Only if We’re Watching the Results
U.S.A.–-(Ammoland.com)- Our cities and states are different. Rules matter, and we can see how important the differences really are. Elections have consequences, but it might take time for the effects to become clear. This is one of those times. The laboratory of democracy is working. We get to see the policies that succeed and those that sounded good but failed miserably. Now, we have to expand the successes and make sure the voters correct their mistakes.
Washington State– There was a violent attack in Seattle last week. Two criminals fought a gun battle on a crowded street. Eight innocent bystanders were wounded and another was murdered. It is important to note that Seattle has extensive gun-control laws by any standard. It also has a problem with mental health and open drug markets. Each time a criminal hurts innocent people, the state and local government put another infringement on the right of law abiding people to defend themselves. Seattle politicians said the new gun laws would make us safe. These laws did the opposite. Perhaps because of those new restrictions, both shootings and fatal shootings increased in Seattle.
If you doubted before, here is clear evidence that criminals don’t obey our gun laws. The two murderers in the recent Seattle attack had 66 prior arrests. As convicted felons, they were prohibited from possessing firearms. Facing the public outrage for this attack, Seattle politicians will pass another ineffective gun-prohibition and put out another press release claiming they solved the problem. Unfortunately, the Seattle progressives won’t fix their failed judicial system. That means more innocent victims will die. Public policy in Seattle will only change once the voters of Seattle change their politicians.
Will they learn, and will we learn from their experience?
California politicians work for the state employee unions. Now that they have huge unfunded state pensions, massive state debt, and huge outmigration of the middle class, the politicians have chosen to massively raise property taxes. Unfortunately, Californians already pay some of the largest taxes in the US, and the state has one of the worst climates for business. High costs and lack of jobs squeezed the middle class out of California. To give a concrete example, it is insanely hard to run a retail store in California when shoplifting goes unpunished. The shoplifters will bite and pepper spray the store clerks and then dare the store to call the cops. I don’t know how these shop owners stay in business, but the rest of us pay for their losses.
California politicians also voted for extensive gun-control laws. With a state full of “gun free” zones, there are evidently too many disarmed and irresistible targets for mass murderers. Rather than deliver the peace the progressive politicians promised, California has a record number of mass murders. In this case, disarming the victims delivered more dead bodies. The only “hope and prayers” they deserve are that Californians change the future they voted for. Like helping a drug addict, it would be a sin to give them money before they hit bottom and fire their political junkies.
We can learn a lot from California. California voters have given us a wonderful example of what not to do.
New York recently instituted a catch and release plan for criminal, a.k.a. bail reform. The explosion of crime was remarkable. Bank robbers were back on the street in hours. Drug dealers who were caught with seven million dollars of fentanyl were released without bail. That would be comical if it were not for the lives at risk.
You can now sell drugs, and use children to sell drugs, without having to post bail. You can strangle someone until they pass out..and then walk out of the police station with a ticket to appear. Victims of domestic violence should be terrified.
If you live in New York, then expect your bank fees to increase to cover the increased costs of losses and security. I don’t know what you should do if you have children in New York and want to protect them from drugs on the street. It is cold comfort to remind you that this is the government you put in office..and can vote out of office. The rest of us can only watch in horror.
Democrat politicians recently took over the state of Virginia. They hold both houses, and statewide offices. Virginia had the fourth lowest crime rate in the country. The democrats wasted no time in changing Virginia laws. Soon, 16 year olds in Virginia will need parental supervision to hunt on their own property, but will be able to get an abortion without informing their parents. There are the usual Democrat measures of drivers licenses for illegals, free tuition for illegals, and eliminating voter ID.
Virginia Democrats also proposed a number of new gun-control laws. They proposed mandatory firearms confiscation. They also proposed mandatory background checks, not for a firearms sale, but for change of possession. That means you could neither use your friend’s gun, nor could you let your daughter-in-law have a firearm if she was being threatened without first going to a firearms dealer. Heaven help you if your daughter-in-law needs help on a Saturday night.
Virginia Democrats also proposed magazine capacity restrictions, and to make the capital a “gun-free zone”.. unless you were an elected politician. The rules don’t apply to them, so they can carry what and where you can’t.
At least 22 thousand citizens came to Richmond to protest and lobby for their rights. I don’t think the Democrats were listening. Money talks, and Virginia Democrats only heard the campaign donations from anti-gun New York Billionaire Michael Bloomberg.
In response, we saw the second-amendment sanctuary movement spread across Virginia and across the rest of the country. When state legislatures don’t listen to the voters, then hundreds of thousands of voters went to their county boards. They asked for, and were usually granted, a measure saying that the county would not spend money and enforce laws that violated the US constitution. In Virginia, 91 out of 95 counties, 16 out of 38 independent cities, and 34 towns adopted second amendment sanctuary resolutions.
You can buy an election, but you can’t buy the voters. The response to the takeover of Virginia isn’t over. Last week, the West Virginia legislature and governor invited the unrepresented counties in Virginia to secede from Richmond and become part of West Virginia.
I was inspired. That might be the best political solution I’ve heard.
There is a lot to learn as we look across these United States. I’m inspired by our successes, and we don’t have to settle for failure. If your vote doesn’t count at the ballot box, then vote with your feet.. or take your county with you.
About Rob Morse
The original article with references is here. Rob Morse writes about gun rights at Ammoland, at Clash Daily, and on his SlowFacts blog. He hosts the Self Defense Gun Stories Podcast and co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast. Rob is an NRA pistol instructor and combat handgun competitor.
The post The Laboratory of Democracy is Working, but Only if We’re Watching the Results appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/2Uag31P
via IFTTT
AmmoLand News’ Content the Target of Elizabeth Warren’s New “Ministry of Truth” VIDEO
Opinion
Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- “If we lived in a State where virtue were profitable, common sense would make us ‘good,’ and greed would make us ‘saints.’ And, we'd live like animals or angels in the happy land that needs no heroes. But since in fact, we see that avarice, anger, envy, pride, sloth, lust, and stupidity commonly profit far beyond humility, chastity, fortitude, justice and thought, we have to choose, to be human at all. We must stand-fast sometimes, even at the risk of being heroes.” ~ Sir Thomas More (played by Paul Scofield), from the 1966 film version of Robert Bolt’s book, “A Man for All Seasons #add”
In a state where “secrets of the heart,” or “thought crimes” were in force, that state could arrest you and eventually cut your head off, for “thinking non-government-approved thoughts”
Our Founders wisely rejected that dangerous path!
In our civilization, “crimes” are defined in statute as specific acts. All else, you are free to do, and “Secrets of your heart” remain so. Refrain from committing crimes, and the state will leave you alone.
At least, that’s the theory of it.
For example, in our civilization, “bigotry” while opposed by “public policy,” is still not a “crime.”
“That man is a bigot” may not represent a complement in most quarters, but “being a bigot” is not a crime! As an American, I can “be a bigot” when I so choose, and still walk about safely.
The reason is elementary, and should be obvious to all:
The term “bigotry” is too vague and too subject to wide variations in interpretation to find a legitimate place in Law.
You can make the same persuasive case against terms like, “racist,” “sexist,” and “abuser of power.”
It would require an all-powerful “Ministry of Truth” to “interpret” such ambiguous terms, and with history to guide us, we can confidently predict the Ministry’s “definitions” will be even more vague, puzzling, and evasive than the original, undefined term.
As Ayn Rand reminds us,
“No discussion, cooperation, agreement, nor understanding is possible among men who substitute emotion for proof.”
This is why “crimes” are (usually) carefully defined, and require a specific act.
The accusation, “That man is a criminal,” should invoke the response:
“What crime has he committed?”
When the response is silence, that man should go his way in peace, his rights of citizenship unmolested.
Unfortunately, leftists, who love personal power more than they love this country, when in power dishonestly alter the “Law” in order to create a way of punishing non-supporters, and particularly those who speak-out against them. They have done so for as long as any of us can remember.
To do this, the left perverts our legal system by turning thoughts into crimes, so that “racists,” “bigots,” and “abjures of power” can be herded into gulags, and quietly disposed of. This is exactly what Elizabeth Warren is currently proposing, with a straight face.
Interpretations of “thought crimes” can easily, conveniently be altered to fit the circumstances.
Thus when the state, under leftist control, tries to “help” a certain class of citizens, which it likes more than all other citizens, results are just as ruinous (to the individual and the nation) as when the state actively persecutes a certain class of citizens, a class which it dislikes more than the rest.
Such professed “assistance,” to some, and punishments to others (like taking all your guns away, without you ever being so much as accused of a crime), are always marketed to a naive public with cries of moral superiority, and predictions of “Armageddon” if they don’t become the Law of the Land.
How many times must we explode this evil, socialist/Communist falsehood?
Self-professed “liberals” want to retain the glory of capitalism, while vilifying, then punishing, capitalists.
Worse yet, they flirt with socialism/Communism, naively thinking predictable ruinous results (ecumenical squalor, poverty, slavery) can be somehow avoided.
“The Law is not a ‘light’ for you, nor any man, to see by. The Law is not an ‘instrument’ of any kind. The Law is a causeway upon which, so long as he keeps to it, a citizen may walk safely.” ~ Thomas More, again
/John
About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.
It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com
The post AmmoLand News’ Content the Target of Elizabeth Warren’s New “Ministry of Truth” VIDEO appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/37ErZNu
via IFTTT
Gun supporters shift sights to college campuses
Oregon: Gun Lock Down Law Hearing Scheduled
Oregon – -(AmmoLand.com)- As expected, the Democrats in Salem are wasting no time trying to ram through their anti-gun agenda.
HB 4005, mandatory gun lock-ups, is now scheduled for Feb 7th at 1 pm in Hearing Room E at the State Capitol by the House Judiciary Committee. (Of course, everything is subject to change.)
This bill not only forces you to lock up your self-defense firearms, it punishes you even if you DO lock up firearms. While it penalizes gun owners if their firearms are stolen, it does nothing to penalize gun thieves.
The bill makes you strictly liable for the misuse of guns that were stolen from you!
It requires that you use dangerous and easily defeated “trigger” or “cable” locks that violate every rule of gun safety but mandates that you be prosecuted if you use them and a thief can defeat them, which of course any thief can.
The bill also virtually eliminates minor’s use of firearms even to protect themselves and their families in their own homes. Under this bill, a 17-year-old with years of shooting experience would not be allowed to have access to a self-defense firearm. Imagine how this will affect families in remote areas.
Needless to say, this bill will have a devastating effect on youth shooting programs.
The bill requires (for no discernible reason) that firearms that are lawfully transferred (through gun dealers) are locked up during transfer and make the transferor liable for two years for misuse of a legally transferred firearm if it was not locked. This assumes that for some reason the person to whom you lawfully transferred a firearm, with a background check, will not remove the required lock…for two years!
None of the components of this bill make anyone safer. In fact, these rules can easily get people killed in the event of a criminal attack.
Please use this form to contact the Oregon House members and demand that they vote this bill down in committee. You may alter the subject line and add your own message if you choose. (Not required.)
You can email testimony against this bill to the House Judiciary Committee here: hjud.exhibits@oregonlegislature.gov
The day before this bill is scheduled, February 6th, gun owners are encouraged to join our friends from Timber Unity on the Capitol Steps at 9am to stand up for liberty. Oregon Firearms Federation has been invited and we hope to see you there.
About Oregon Firearms Federation:
The Oregon Firearms Federation has proven itself to be Oregon's only no-compromise lobbying group, OFF takes the same tough stands and serves as a vehicle for educating gun owners, promoting their rights and when necessary, fighting the freedom haters in court. Visit: www.oregonfirearms.org
The post Oregon: Gun Lock Down Law Hearing Scheduled appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/38Tnyyw
via IFTTT
Rhinelander Special Olympics holds fundraiser at Pizza Ranch
Tricia Zunker on school choice: public dollars should fund public education
OUR VIEW: College campuses are no place for pistols
Davenport Arrest
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
Middle names itself a '2nd Amendment sanctuary'
Texan firefighters train at Camp Perkins
UW-Madison veterinary school featured in Super Bowl ad
Officials break ground on future transportation facility
Gun safety classes expand in York-Poquoson during 2nd Amendment debate
Lawmakers React to Justice Call for Virginia Counties to Secede
Two local counties become 2nd Amendment Sanctuaries
Gun advocates pushing towns to adopt 2nd Amendment 'sanctuary' resolutions
County plans to pass Second Amendment resolution
Background checks and bump stock bans: 2020 Democrats on gun control
Dan Henderson: Don't mess with our freedom
President Donald Trump Praises Party-Switching New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew, Rails Against ...
Once in a Lifetime Presidential Visit
LETTER: Don't declare Mount Olive a 2nd Amendment sanctuary
VB schools recaps findings from lead testing and outlines steps for the future
Gun supporters shift sights to college
Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Letter: Explore different ideas about 'sanctuary'
Lawmakers react to Justice call for Virginia counties to secede
The Oregon Federation of College Republicans is pushing back against those who oppose your ...
Newport News sees overall decrease in crime; chief says combating increase in aggravated ...
Group plans to petition Norfolk City Council to force discussion on 2nd Amendment sanctuary issue
Evers signs bill to increase homeless shelter funding
Gun rights supporters need signatures to make Norfolk City Council add 2nd Amendment ...
Articles from the January 29, 2020 edition
Richland County Republicans Hold Meeting For Sanctuary Proposals
McDowell County becomes 2nd Amendment Sanctuary County
Langlade Co. Board sends 2A Sanctuary resolution to Public Safety Committee hearing; frustrating ...
District 4 BOS candidates clash over immigration, debate priorities
Gun rights advocates push for Alpena County to become a 2nd Amendment sanctuary
Lincoln County Board reviews 2nd Amendment Sanctuary resolution
Request Filed with DOJ for Any Record of Second Amendment Statements of Interest
U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)-A Freedom of Information Act request was filed Tuesday with the Department of Justice by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh. The request, filed on behalf of this writer, seeks DOJ “statements of interest” in defense of the Second Amendment comparable to what the Department has done in defense of the First Amendment.
“Imagine a society in which a citizen must petition the government for permission to meet with his fellow citizens,” the DOJ wrote in its statement filed in December in Brown v Jones County Junior College. “Imagine further that such requests must be made at least three days in advance of the requested meeting, and that the government has unbridled discretion to determine who may meet with whom, and about what they might speak. Such extreme preconditions to speech might not be out of place in Oceania, the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America.”
But “preconditions like these” have a place in the United States of America when it comes to the right of the people to keep and bear arms? Considering the historical evils that have always accompanied a “monopoly of violence,” Orwell’s Oceania seems like a resort community.
“The United States further states that the Attorney General enforces 34 U.S.C. § 12601 ‘which provides in relevant part that governmental authorities and their agents may not ‘engage in a pattern or practice by law enforcement officers… that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States’ and that the Attorney General ‘may in a civil action obtain the appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice,’” the DOJ statement asserted.
So they’ll go after violations for other rights, but where the Second Amendment is concerned, state entities can do as they please without fear of federal checks? Even though infringements directly affect the “security of a free State” by disarming the citizen Militia?
So much for “the supreme Law of the Land.”
This reminds me of nothing so much as “The Ashcroft Petition” project I co-authored and co-administered several years back. After then-Attorney General John Ashcroft had declared “the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right of individuals to keep and bear firearms,” my colleagues and I decided to see if those were just words or if there was any chance the DOJ would do its job and protect individual rights from being infringed.
The upshot—after collecting and submitting over 40,000 mailed-in signatures from supporters across the country (including “Gunners Guru” Col. Jeff Cooper), the only official reply we got was a mealy-mouthed nothing burger, pointedly sent from the head of DOJ’s Terrorism and Violent Crime Section. That, and I had to write a letter to then-NRA-ILA head James Jay Baker demanding that he instruct their California field rep to stop telling people not to sign the petition because those of us behind it were “wild-eyed extremists.”
In any case, today is supposedly a new day and we have since had two Supreme Court cases confirming what Mr. Ashcroft once assured us, that the Second Amendment is an individual right. So now it’s time to find out what, if anything, our Department of Justice has done to fulfill duties it acknowledges in court filings to enforce against government actions “that deprive persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It’s time to find out what kind of “appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice” we can expect from those whose entire existence is justified on doing just that.
Here’s our FOIA request:
FOIA DOJ Statement of Inter…
I’ll write an update when I hear back from DOJ.
About David Codrea:
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.
The post Request Filed with DOJ for Any Record of Second Amendment Statements of Interest appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/2U3FPVv
via IFTTT
NJ Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Gun Rights,,, Wait What!?
New Jersey – -(AmmoLand.com)- Overturning both a County Superior Court and an Appellate Division decision, the law firm of Evan F. Nappen, Attorney at Law successfully petitioned the NJ Supreme Court for a unanimous Opinion released today mandating that people must be provided with hearings whenever a court contemplates denying a handgun carry permit and that such hearings must be held within 30 days.
New Jersey’s highest court today held that: “if a court has any questions regarding the applicant or his or her permit to carry application, it must hold a hearing to address those questions. The court should not simply deny the application.” “[A] hearing must be held whenever the court contemplates denying a handgun carry-permit[.]”
NOTE: The above bold text for emphasis appears in the Supreme Court Opinion In Re Application for Permit to Carry a Handgun of Calvin Carlstrom and Syllabus.
This is believed to be the first pro-gun rights decision ever issued unanimously by the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Carlstrom was hired by a security company to be an armed guard protecting movie theatres. In 2016, he applied for a New Jersey permit to carry a handgun which, after an investigation, was approved by the Roselle Park Police Chief.
In New Jersey, however, county judges actually issue these permits, and Carlstrom’s application supporting documents was accordingly forwarded to the Union County Superior Court.
On February 2, 2017, Judge William A. Daniel denied Carlstrom’s application without ever providing Carlstrom with a hearing on the merits of his application.
Under New Jersey’s governing statute, carry permit applicants are specifically afforded a hearing if a police chief denies an application. The statute, however, is silent whether a judge must provide a hearing if the Court intends to deny an application that has been approved by a police chief.
Carlstrom hired the Nappen Firm to appeal the “trial” court’s decision. Nevertheless, on December 21, 2018, Appellate Division Judges Michael J. Haas and Stephanie Ann Mitterhoff affirmed Judge Daniel’s opinion, deciding that Carlstrom had “no authority to support his argument that a hearing is required in matters involving perfunctory licensing applications or that the court must hear testimony from the chief of police who reviewed an application.”
The Nappen Firm believed differently and appealed higher, Petitioning for Certification to the New Jersey Supreme Court on behalf of Carlstrom.
After this filing, on May 20, 2019, the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) promulgated Administrative Directive #06-19: Criminal – Procedures for Processing Gun Permits, which provided that trial courts must hold a hearing if it has any questions regarding the applicant or his or her permit to carry application. Today’s NJSC Opinion affirmatively incorporates the AOC Directive into precedential case law that county judges must now follow.
The NJSC Opinion also mandates that carry permit hearings “must be held no later than 30 days after receipt of the permit to carry application, and the court shall make a determination within 14 days thereafter, absent extraordinary circumstances.”
Carlstrom’s Appellate and Supreme Court matters were briefed and argued by Louis P. Nappen, Esq., of the Law firm of Evan F. Nappen, Attorney at Law, PC, Eatontown NJ.
In response to the NJSC Opinion, Louis Nappen said, “This is an outstanding Due Process victory for gun owners. This will be particularly important when the United States Supreme Court – we anticipate – provides a heightened scrutiny level to the right to carry and scraps New Jersey’s ‘justifiable need’ requirement for the issuance of carry permits. People will now be assured their days in court if a judge intends to deny this Constitutional right.”
The New Jersey Supreme Court further remanded Carlstrom’s matter back to the Law Division to conduct a hearing on his application with guidance as to the scope of that hearing. The NJSC noted that, at that hearing, at the judge’s discretion, amendments to the application as well as other evidence not included in the application may be admitted, as well as evidence regarding discussions with the police chief and any written conclusions by the reviewing chief and testimony from the applicant or his or her employer.
The opinion may be read by clicking here: https://njcourts.gov/attorneys/assets/opinions/supreme/a_63_18.pdf?c=cdi
re Application for Permit to Carry a Handgun of Calvin Carlstrom
About Evan Nappen:
Evan Nappen (www.EvanNappen.com) is a criminal defense attorney who has focused on New Jersey firearms and weapons law for several decades. He is the author of the New Jersey Gun Law Guide. Visit his website at www.EvanNappen.com
The post NJ Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Gun Rights,,, Wait What!? appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/2S1Pd9s
via IFTTT
Florida’s Bill Galvano is Trying to Give Bloomberg his Gun Control Monies’ Worth
Official Communication by Marion P. Hammer
Unified Sportsmen of Florida Executive Director
NRA Past President
Florida – -(AmmoLand.com)- “Bill Galvano is trying to give Bloomberg his moneys worth by shoving this gun control bill down the [FL] Senate’s throat. That is not what a true conservative does. He is a RINO. Floridians deserve better! #FixIt ” — Andrew Pollack
That statement was posted on social media following Thursday's (1/23/20) media reports that Florida Senate President Bill Galvano was optimistic about getting his massive gun control bill (SB-7028) passed.
Andrew Pollack is the father of Meadow Pollack – a beautiful young lady killed by the deranged Parkland murderer. Pollack posted his statement on social media following Galvano's latest expression of confidence for passing a gun control bill in the Florida Senate this session.
In a News Service of Florida article on Thursday, it was reported that Florida Senate President “[Bill] Galvano expressed optimism that the bill has a chance as it awaits a hearing in the Judiciary Committee.”
The Judiciary Committee is chaired by Sen. David Simmons (R-Longwood).
Galvano's new optimism for passing his gun control bill came after Governor DeSantis made a statement to reporters that seemed to defend Galvano as being a good guy who supports President Trump but did not defend him for taking Bloomberg money. It is widely known that Galvano was upset that Donald Trump, Jr. called him out for taking half-a-million-dollars ($500,000) from anti-gun Democrat, Michael Bloomberg.
Donald Trump, Jr. was quoted in The Daily Wire as saying, “Any supposed ‘Republican' who proudly accepts money from Mini Mike Bloomberg and is supportive of his gun control agenda is nothing more than a stone cold RINO. The last thing Florida Republicans need is a liberal, gun-grabbing Bloomberg minion leading them in the State Senate.”
Andrew Pollack, father of Meadow Pollack – a beautiful young lady shot killed by the deranged Parkland murderer – posted his statement on social media following Galvano's latest expression of confidence for passing a gun control bill in the Florida Senate this session.
The good thing to come out of the meeting with the press in which the Governor tried to say that Galvano is a good guy (even though he took money from Bloomberg) is that Governor DeSantis went on the record to say he is opposed to Galvano's gun control bill.
Asked by a reporter,“I take it you're not supporting the bill?” Governor DeSantis responded, “THAT'S CORRECT.”
So, thank you Governor Desantis for going on record in opposition to SB-7028.
We're delighted Governor DeSantis is on record against the bill, and we don't fault him for saying that Galvano is his friend and is a strong supporter of President Trump.
However, Bloomberg is not a friend of Republicans, in fact he spent a huge amount of money AGAINST Governor DeSantis in the Governors election in 2018.
We can only speculate as to why Bloomberg gave — and Galvano took — $500,000. Bloomberg is an anti-gun Democrat running for US President and he clearly did not give Galvano $500,000 to help elect true Republicans to the Florida Senate.
About Unified Sportsmen of Florida;
Unified Sportsmen of Florida was organized in 1976 for the purpose of protecting the firearms rights of all law-abiding firearms owners in Florida.
Contact:
Unified Sportsmen of Florida
110-A South Monroe Street
P.O.Box 1387
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
850-222-9518
The post Florida’s Bill Galvano is Trying to Give Bloomberg his Gun Control Monies’ Worth appeared first on AmmoLand.com.
from https://ift.tt/38L3TR9
via IFTTT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)